Attracting More Horses
This entry was posted on 4/3/2007 5:56 PM and is filed under Recruiting.
Attracting More Horses
Are you sometimes frustrated by an inability to engage in ministry
those who could do the most? If not, you are by yourself.
The people who have the most ability to lead the Great Commission are
often those most difficult to get on board. They seem to want to
live their life their way, do their on thing. Sometimes those are
poor soil. Just as often, however, I believe we misread who they are.
Very recently I dealt with one of these people, and the experience
reminded me of a booklet Jim Furr referred to us, “Shepherding Horses”
by Kent Humphries, director of what was Fellowship Of Christian
Companies, now called Chirst@Work. The person I was dealing with
was definitely a horse: a powerful person, strong willed, independent,
and not easily controlled. Horses form most of our target, though
we gather others in the process.
Kent says these people and most organizations have differing
characteristics, leading to distrust rather than harmony. Knowing
these characteristics, we can form partnerships rather than
frustration. I will summarize those characteristics:
Horses (independent influencers):
* They are self sufficient and fearless, and/or will seek to appear so.
Say you played Pinehurst, they will say they played Augusta. Say
you work in ministry, they will say they have funded dozens.
* They want to control the things they are involved in.
* They have been affected by a pagan workplace. Their values have
been compromised in ways in which they may not be aware, but they know
they are not what they should be.
Organizations:
* Have clearly defined missions.
* Align resources to accomplish those missions.
* Are staffed by people whose self worth is often tied to the accomplishment of those missions.
You see how the two will miscommunicate. We ask a horse to get
involved in what we are doing. He feels inadequate against our
spiritual standards, but thinks he can do things better than we
can. He wants to be in control, which we can’t give him. So
he declines involvement but stands on the sidelines and tell us what we
should be doing better. Sound familiar?
So, how do we break this cycle and release the incredible ability of
the horses among us? It begins with relationships. To break
a horse, equine or human, one must first earn his or her trust.
One must desire to have a relationship with him simply to have the
relationship, communicating no agenda other than to know him.
Then we must communicate that we want to help him achieve his
goals. Only then can we begin to put the bit of submission into
the horse’s mouth, leading him to live by faith, and of course even
then it is God’s bit and not ours.
For those of us who like steps to follow:
1. Begin a no-agenda relationship.
2. Affirm their place in the marketplace, and challenge them to a Kingdom vision.
3. Learn who and what they are, leading them to live by the faith principle in the details of life.
4. Help them decide how they will carry out their new
vision. If our principles are the right ones they will adopt them.
Most of the above fits very well in what we already do day to day. We
are a relational organization with a foundation of a Transferable
Concepts view of the spiritual life. Where some of us will adjust
to the principles of dealing with horses will be in the way we
communicate for whose benefit we are engaging in the
relationship. We may spend less time explaining what we do and
more time listening to what they want, less time in the office and more
time hanging out. We may have to become more adept at giving them
what they want within the framework of what we do in the Great
Commission.
In my conversation with this particular horse, he asked me why he
should do a certain ministry thing I had previously asked him to
do. I was beginning to see that his understanding of his own
calling was not yet at the point of being able to understand how the
action would help him get there. We were not at step 2 above. So
instead of explaining our goals and methods further, I backed
off. I simply asked him to come see another certain thing,
something that might help him understand his calling. I walked
away without what I went there for, but maybe I moved a horse closer to
God’s corral. God and time will tell, which is really all I
have.
David